The meeting lasted twenty-two minutes. The room was mostly quiet, and the agenda was brief, but the moment carried the accumulated weight of a year’s worth of disputes, resignations, and unfinished business. Eric Kelley sat at the center of the Select Board table, occupying the chair he had fought to keep through a recall effort. Across from him sat Vice Chair Steve Darcy, nearing the end of his term. Between them sat a problem neither man had fully created but both now owned. The town was facing a $7 million budget gap.
They were the entire board. Days earlier, member Trish Simpson had resigned less than one year after getting elected. One of two interim town administrators had also stepped down suddenly. What remained of Marshfield’s elected leadership were two men who did not agree on the central question facing the town, sitting across the same table with no way to move forward without the other. A tie vote meant no action at all.
This is how a year of accumulated tension sometimes resolves itself in small towns across the South Shore. There is no climactic vote and no moment of decisive leadership. Instead, there is a mostly empty room, a short agenda, and a stalemate that neither side has the votes to break.
Towns like Marshfield are not supposed to end up here. Coastal, middle-class, and proud of their New England tradition of local self-governance, they rely on systems designed to prevent this kind of paralysis. The Select Board has three seats. A town administrator manages the day-to-day operations regardless of political disagreements. An Advisory Board reviews budgets before they reach a crisis point or get thrown to voters. Each element exists to provide stability when disagreements arise.
Over the course of twelve months, those safeguards appear to have eroded one by one.
It Started When A Bill Came Due
The year had begun to break long before March 2026. In the spring of 2025, during what should have been a routine budget season, officials began acknowledging something uncomfortable. The town administrator noted plans to move forward with paying a roughly $700,000 bill from South Shore Vocational High School without authorization from town meeting. Under Marshfield’s form of government, that authorization is not ceremonial. It is the mechanism through which residents maintain control over public spending.
Town meeting remains the beating heart of New England self-governance. When spending runs ahead of it, the system loses something harder to recover than money.
One official summarized the problem bluntly during a board discussion.
"How are we going to justify moving forward with a $710,000 payment for the South Shore Regional Vocational School when Town Meeting hasn’t approved it?" said then Advisory Board Chair Smith. "That’s a dangerous precedent."
Guidance from the state was clear: regional school tuition must appear in the budget and be approved through the normal process. So, members voted to delay portions of the budget timeline while they gathered more information and crunched the numbers. That delay pushed the annual town meeting off schedule.
Within several days, and after an emergency executive session of the Select Board, Town Administrator Michael Maresco was gone after over 7 years with the town.
As the official responsible for coordinating department heads, organizing budget requests, and translating the Select Board’s priorities into a workable financial plan, his departure left a structural gap at precisely the wrong moment. In a town the size of Marshfield, the administrator serves as connective tissue. The job involves fielding calls from department heads, keeping the budget process on schedule, and ensuring the Select Board is working from reliable numbers rather than assumptions.
Just as important, the administrator carries institutional memory. The role includes knowing why contracts are structured the way they are, which departments require careful management, and where potential problems lie buried in the budget. Without that stabilizing presence, those responsibilities continued under interim leadership, more slowly and with less coordination.
The search for a permanent replacement began while the work of government continued simultaneously. Peter Morin was brought on as an interim administrator on a part-time basis. The $700,000 question that had started the year remained unresolved. Residents who attended Select Board meetings pressed officials for answers. Those officials were still trying to find them.
Handing Over the Gavel
In May, the annual reorganization of the Select Board arrived following the spring election. Simpson had been elected to the board over former Chairwoman Lynne Fiddler and Kelley and Darcy retained their seats. The process of selecting new leadership - a chair and a clerk - should have taken minutes. Instead, it stalled.
Nominations for chair failed to advance. Motions died for lack of a second. For several uncomfortable minutes, the governing body of a town of roughly 22,000 people could not complete its own internal reorganization.
The impasse finally broke when Simpson nominated Kelley. She complicated the nomination almost immediately.
“I feel like I cannot in good conscious nominate Mr. Darcy because of the way he has treated our residents in the past,” she said. “And also he has been going through some personal issues and I’m afraid that this might take away from him being chair, his responsibilities.”
She also addressed reservations about Kelley.
“I do have some reservations with Eric being chair in the fact that talking to a lot of the residents, they’re not happy with the way he has voted in the past,” Simpson said.
“I feel like I cannot in good conscious nominate Mr. Darcy because of the way he has treated our residents in the past...I do have some reservations with Eric being chair in the fact that talking to a lot of the residents, they’re not happy with the way he has voted in the past.”Trish Simspon
The comment placed reservations about both men on the public record at the same moment. It was an unusual way to begin a year that would require the three officials to work together closely.
The board voted unanimously for Kelley anyway. Kelley nominated Darcy as vice chair. Darcy nominated Simpson as clerk. The structure of the board was settled, though the arrangement satisfied no one completely.
“We’ve got a lot to do,” Kelley said.
Public Tensions Mount
By June, the tensions inside the board had become visible to the public.
Darcy warned during a meeting that the board had grown too fractured to function effectively. “We’re fighting with other boards and departments in town,” he said. “We’re not working cohesively together as a team.”
The immediate dispute involved a Pride Proclamation that had been removed from the Select Board agenda. Residents argued that no single official should have the authority to remove an item without the board’s consent. The removal itself might have been minor, but the debate that followed revealed a deeper disagreement about who controlled the agenda and how decisions were being made.
That same meeting produced a debate about whether the town should seek competitive bids for legal services instead of renewing longtime town counsel Bob Galvin’s contract.
Department heads lined up to defend him. DPW Superintendent Sean Patterson offered a warning based on experience in another municipality.
“The town I worked in prior to coming here got rid of their town counsel after 32 years,” Patterson said. “It was an absolute disaster.”
The board ultimately reappointed Galvin by a vote of two to one. The result mattered less than what the vote revealed. A board that could not reach consensus on routine decisions was unlikely to find easy agreement on more difficult ones.
A Friend And A Summoning
July brought the year's most dramatic confrontation to that point.
Housing Authority Commissioner Joe Pecevich had used his local cable television program to accuse Police Chief Phil Tavares and other officials of conspiring to pursue criminal charges against him for political reasons. The allegations went far beyond normal political criticism. They accused law enforcement officials of misconduct.
Tavares responded by calling Pecevich directly. According to the chief, he wanted to give Pecevich an opportunity to retract the accusations before the situation escalated publicly.
Pecevich saw the call differently. In his telling, it was a threatening conversation in which the chief warned him to prepare for “an onslaught” if the accusations continued.
Pecevich, who many say is a close personal friend of Kelley, filed a formal complaint with the Select Board. In a matter of days, the police chief received a letter summoning him before the board for a closed-door discussion of his conduct and character.
Tavares asked that the matter be discussed in open session rather than behind closed doors. “With full transparency for the whole town,” he said.
Residents filled the room. The board’s three members responded in different ways. Simpson suggested issuing a verbal warning, noting what she described as Tavares’s stellar career. Darcy argued the complaint should be dismissed outright.
Kelley took a different position. He argued that parts of the complaint described comments that could reasonably be interpreted as threatening and voted to pursue further investigation.
The motion failed. The board declined to take action against the chief by a vote of two to one.
Pecevich is currently seeking a seat on the Select Board.
"Your Have No Right to Threaten My Employment, Sir."
September brought another confrontation.
Building Commissioner Andrew Stewart appeared before the Select Board and accused Kelley of interfering with the work of his department. Stewart said the chair had forwarded complaints from anonymous residents, pressured him about enforcement decisions, and attempted to involve himself in matters that should have been handled through established procedures.
“You have no right to threaten my employment, sir,” Stewart told Kelley during the meeting.
Stewart explained that building enforcement requires formal complaints from residents before investigations begin. Anonymous messages forwarded by elected officials bypass that process and risk undermining the fairness of the system.
He also reminded the board that day-to-day supervision of town employees runs through the town administrator, not individual members of the Select Board.
“The role of the Select Board chair is not to give daily administrative direction to the building commissioner,” Stewart said.
Kelley declined to respond publicly afterward.
A Failed Recall
The political pressure surrounding Kelley eventually took the form of a recall campaign. Residents who had followed the year’s disputes began organizing an effort to remove him from the Select Board, arguing that the town needed different leadership during a period of mounting conflict inside Town Hall.
Kelley responded publicly to the effort, saying the disagreements playing out during Select Board meetings reflected legitimate policy differences rather than dysfunction.
Recall organizers began collecting signatures in an attempt to force a recall election. Under the town’s charter, the effort required a minimum number of certified signatures before the question could be placed on the ballot.
The campaign ultimately fell short of that threshold.
Because the petition did not gather enough signatures to qualify, the recall never advanced to a townwide vote. Kelley remained in his position as chair of the Select Board, even as the tensions that fueled the recall effort continued to shape debates inside Town Hall.
Budget Pressures Become Clear
By early winter, the budget troubles emerged.
Department requests exceeded projected revenue by roughly $7 million. The size of the gap meant it could not be solved with minor adjustments. No travel line cut or supply budget reduction would close the deficit.
The town faced a choice that municipalities often try to avoid. Officials could cut deeply into services or pursue a property tax override requiring approval at town meeting and again at the ballot box.
Seven million dollars represents tangible things in a municipal budget. It represents teachers, firefighters, road crews, library hours, and senior services.
Department heads who had submitted their requests were now being asked to imagine how their operations would function with significantly less funding.
The delayed timeline meant the Advisory Board received detailed budget numbers later than usual. That left less time for careful review.
The financial crisis that had been building quietly all year had finally become unavoidable.
A Crisis Emerges
By March, the crises converged.
During a packed joint meeting of the Select Board and Advisory Board, teachers, parents, and residents filled the room to demand answers about the override question. School officials warned that without additional revenue, staffing cuts and program reductions were unavoidable.
Residents wanted to understand how the town had arrived at a $7 million deficit and whether it could have been prevented.
Within days of that meeting, Simpson resigned from the Select Board. Shortly afterward, Charlie Sumner, one of two interim town administrators, also stepped down.
The board’s third seat and its executive leadership were both gone.
What remained was Kelley and Darcy.
Deadlock
On March 30, the two men sat across the table from each other during a meeting that lasted twenty-two minutes.
Darcy argued that the decision should ultimately belong to the voters. An override requires two separate approvals, first at town meeting and then at the ballot box.
“It’s like a safety deposit box with two keys,” he said. “The first key goes to town meeting, and the second key goes to the ballot box.”
Kelley disagreed. He argued that the town was already spending beyond its means and that a $7 million override would postpone rather than solve the underlying problem. Property taxes in a coastal Massachusetts town are not abstract numbers. For residents living on fixed incomes or families stretched to afford housing, a major tax increase can force difficult decisions.
“I think $7 million is going to put a lot of people out of this town,” he said.
Neither man was entirely wrong. They were answering different questions. Darcy focused on who should decide. Kelley focused on whether the decision itself was sound.
Both held their positions.
With only two members present, the board required unanimity to act. No motion could pass. No direction could be set. The deadlock was built into the arithmetic of a three-seat board that had lost its third member.
The meeting ended.
Marshfield moves forward to town meeting and the annual election carrying the full weight of the year that preceded it. A series of disputes that had once seemed separate had accumulated into something larger. The town’s governing body had been reduced to two men who could not agree, sitting in a nearly empty room with a problem that had not waited for them to resolve their differences.
What happens next will be decided, as Darcy put it, by two keys.
The question now is whether anyone can agree on the locks.
Sarah Farris and Annie Jones contributed to this article.
About the South Shore Times
The South Shore Times is an independent, locally-owned digital news platform, free to readers, that covers communities south of Boston, including Marshfield. Our articles are written by South Shore reporters, not AI.
For more South Shore news, subscribe to our newsletter.